Basically what I meant is fcsnetworker is a good tool to automate your web 2.0 efforts but personally I am not sure its worth the effort. Sorry should of been a bit clearer in my reply :p

Bob,

I think they created the pages on the fly with their version of SerpShaker (I think they have one on steroids). They make a lot of these type of sites, I’m pretty sure they can pu tone out in an hour long session.

Just my 2 cents as I’m bored and scouring the forum.

Big Happy

@justinkunst  It is really a case by case basis.  We do have a FAQ/Problem section in our support area: http://help.semeasy.com/

If you are getting a 404 error that means that the page doesn’t exist.  It could be for a multitude of reasons.  It could be a permissions issue, it could be that you don’t have the right url, it could be a dozen…[Read more]

(BUMP)

Not having the same issue… When I say the sky falling, I had multiple emails saying that this method doesn’t work anymore.  A little premature for that… Google doesn’t always work at the speed that we want.

I think I’ll go get the half hot dog.

Thanks

Big

yeah great news keep moving forward 

oh by the way can you lend me a dollar lol …. as there plenty more to come congrats 

Google found us all out!  lol andrew your a joker

look people it that one is taking long to index …. move on to the next site …what ya gonna do sit on your hands for a week ….come on people get moving …. i want to hear those positive stories to keep us all motivated

Congrats Happy! Rinse Repeat!

Kevin,

That is awesome!  Now you have a scalable model.. Yes it is only $1.97 within 48 hours, but now think how you can scale that out.  Pick the right keywords, hammer out some niches, and start by trying to get to $10 a day… Should not be very hard.  That will bank you $300+ a month.  More than pays you your initial investment, with…[Read more]

Ok, let’s try to clear something up…

If you are indexing a website that has already been indexed, well then you are going to have an issue as far as time it takes..  The reason is that Google has started to set your site up on a schedule already.  If you notice, we use BRAND new websites.  Not that it will not work on a website that has al…[Read more]

Good quality web 2.0’s are classed as a quality link so no doubt they help in ranking. Once automated can provide some nice rankings for minimum effort, personally I prefer to just build a couple of high powered PBN links and job done.

No matter what you seem to do it takes a while to index the page using the video sitemap trick. Now if its a PBN site then its probably best to keep things going like this. If however its a money site then using ‘Fetch as Google’ on Google Webmaster Tools gets the page indexed in seconds.

Interested to hear how it works as that was one of my questions too. 

That’s why we all have opinions!  If we all liked the same things I’d have to share my ice cream!  That being said, have put Maverick on the winter TV list to refresh my memory.

You want to have the site done.  Otherwise the pages you add after will get indexes after the crawlers return on their schedule.

This is what happens.  Crawlers will cone to a sute when it is brand spankong new and you use index assault.   After that, Google will put your site into a schedule for indexing.  Even new sutes will get betw…[Read more]

This is not an issue with SS… It has nothing to do with how you created the pages.  It has everything to do with the domain.  It also has nothing to do with Pigeon.

Give us a little history about the domain.

Is it a new domain?

Has it already been indexed?

If you want send me the domain name and credentials and I will go ah…[Read more]